Ask ten candidates to name IMAT universities and most will say the same three or four before they run out. That's not because the list is actually that short. It's because name recognition, not fit or your realistic odds, is doing most of the work in how people build their preference list.
Short answer: lesser-known Italian universities aren't a lower-quality fallback. They teach the exact same nationally regulated medical degree as the famous names - what actually differs is city size, hospital network, and how much competition piles onto a name purely because candidates already recognize it.
Why the same names dominate every conversation
Milan, Rome, and Padova get discussed constantly because candidates hear about them before they even start researching, from forums, social media, or simply because they're the biggest cities. That familiarity is real, but it also means these are exactly the universities where the most other candidates are ranking the same names you are. Popularity and quality aren't the same thing, and popularity is the one that drives up competition for a seat.
What "lesser-known" doesn't mean
It doesn't mean lower quality, and it doesn't mean a lesser degree at the end of it. Every university offering the IMAT-admitted programme teaches the same nationally regulated medical curriculum. What varies is city size, hospital network, cohort size, and how much English-language student life already exists there, not the qualification you graduate with.
A few worth actually researching
Cities like Bari, Chieti, Novara, Varese, and Sassari have run English-taught medicine programmes for IMAT candidates in past admission cycles, alongside the more commonly discussed names. Seat numbers and participating universities can shift from year to year, so the specific list is always worth confirming directly against the current official admissions portal rather than assuming last year's roster still applies. The point isn't to chase any specific city blindly, it's to widen your research past the three or four names everyone already knows before you finalize a preference order.
How to vet one properly
Look at the same things you'd check for a well-known university: which teaching hospital the clinical years run through, roughly how large each cohort is, what existing students actually say about the programme, and what the city itself is like to live in for six years. A smaller, less-discussed university that checks all of these boxes, including what living in a smaller university town is actually like, can be a genuinely strong choice, not just a fallback option.
Where this fits in your overall list
This isn't an argument for ranking a university you know nothing about purely because it might be less competitive. It's an argument for doing the research before you decide it's not worth it. A longer, better-researched preference list gives the ranking system more real options to work with on your behalf, instead of narrowing your own chances down to the handful of names you happened to hear first.
Not sure which universities are even realistically within reach before you start comparing lesser-known options? The Lounge is a free IMAT score predictor - answer a few questions and see exactly where you'd realistically land, and which universities that score would clear.
Try the free Score PredictorThe candidates who end up happiest with where they land are rarely the ones who only ranked the names everyone else already knew.