Knowing you need a few months to prepare doesn't actually tell you what to open your laptop and do on a random Tuesday. Most candidates fill that gap with vague intentions - "study biology today" - and wonder later why weeks pass without feeling like real progress.
A realistic week has actual structure: subject time weighted like the exam itself, mostly active timed practice over passive re-reading, one session dedicated to reviewing last week's mistakes, a longer timed block as test day nears, and a scheduled rest day built in rather than skipped.
Weight your days like the exam is weighted
If biology is 23 of 60 questions and physics & maths is 13, your week should roughly reflect that - not an identical block for every subject regardless of how much of the exam it represents. In practice that might mean two full sessions on biology for every one on physics & maths, not because physics matters less, but because there's proportionally less of it to cover.
A shape that actually works, regardless of your total hours
Within each week: most sessions should be active practice - real questions, timed, reviewed properly - not passive re-reading. One session should specifically target whatever mistakes came up in the previous week's practice, not new material. And at least one session, especially as test day gets closer, should be a longer timed block that mimics real exam conditions, not a comfortable 20-minute burst.
Rest isn't optional inside this structure - it's a scheduled input, the same as any study session. A week with no planned rest isn't a more intense week, it's a week that's quietly setting up the burnout we've written about separately.
Review the week, not just the day
End of each week, ask honestly: did the hours actually go where the exam weight says they should have, or did comfort quietly pull time toward whatever subject felt easiest? That single weekly check catches drift long before it becomes a real gap in your prep - waiting until a mock exam to notice is much more expensive than catching it a week at a time. If you're not sure how many weeks you're actually working with, our piece on how many months the IMAT realistically needs is worth reading alongside this.
Want help building a week that's actually calibrated to your real gaps, not a generic template? That's exactly what 1:1 mentorship is built around.
Apply for the mentorshipA study plan measured only in total hours is easy to feel good about and hard to actually trust. A study plan measured in weighted, reviewed weeks is harder to keep up appearances with - and far more likely to actually move your score.